California and Nevada, weighed as two operating environments.
Not which state is better — the wrong question. This instrument weighs both environments
on the same five decision lenses and shows which coordination priorities change when the
environment does. Same reasoning every state is read through; here, side by side.
Each lens turns a tax environment into a household decision.
A dashed row means the two environments read the same on that lens; a solid row means they differ.
severe
Rate pressureHow much does the state erode each realized gain?
none
CaliforniaThe state takes 13.3% of every long-term gain at the top — severe drag on what a realized return keeps.
NevadaNo state tax on gains — every realized gain keeps its full federal-only outcome.
none
Estate exposureDoes the state tax the estate below the federal threshold, and how steeply?
none
CaliforniaNo state estate or inheritance tax — only the federal estate tax reaches the estate.
NevadaNo state estate or inheritance tax — only the federal estate tax reaches the estate.
high
Harvesting leverageHow much is a harvested loss worth here?
low
CaliforniaA harvested loss is worth the 13.3% state rate it offsets, on top of federal — high harvesting leverage.
NevadaWith no state tax on gains, a harvested loss recovers only its federal value — the state adds no rate for it to offset.
high
Mobility valueHow much could a change of residency be worth?
none
CaliforniaBoth the rate and the estate regime make relocation genuinely valuable — but domicile is a fact pattern, not a mailing address.
NevadaAlready a no-income-tax, no-estate-tax state — the destination other households move toward, not from.
high
Basis coordinationWhat basis-step-up opportunity does the marital-property regime create?
high
CaliforniaCommunity-property state: community assets get a FULL step-up at the first death — title them so the survivor keeps that basis.
NevadaCommunity-property state: community assets get a FULL step-up at the first death — title them so the survivor keeps that basis.
Which coordination priorities change
The household's operating-system domains each environment opens.
The middle column holds where they agree; the outer columns are what is unique to each.
Only California
Residency & domicile· advisor + CPA
Whether — and how — a change of domicile is worth pursuing, and the facts (days, home, ties) that make it real rather than nominal.
Loss harvesting· advisor + CPA
Setting a harvesting cadence that captures the state rate a banked loss offsets, sequenced against the state's loss-carryforward rules.
Asset location· advisor
Placing the high-turnover sleeve in tax-advantaged accounts so the state's rate falls on the least of the household's realized gains.
Shared
Asset titling for step-up· estate attorney
Titling assets to capture the fullest basis step-up the marital-property regime allows at the first death.
0%No state tax on capital gains — and a harvested loss is worth only the federal rate here.
Marriage treatment
2xJoint brackets are double the single brackets — generally marriage-neutral.
No state income tax — no marriage penalty on the state return.
Loss treatment
federalCapital losses carry forward under the federal Section 1212 rules — a harvested loss nets against gains and rolls forward until used.
No state tax on capital gains, so a harvested loss carries no state benefit; its value here is only the federal offset.
Municipal bonds
in-stateOnly in-state municipal-bond interest escapes state tax; bonds from other states are taxed. The classic in-state muni preference that rewards a home-state ladder.
exemptMunicipal-bond interest is exempt from state tax whether the issuer is in-state or out-of-state — the broadest muni preference (states with no tax on investment income, plus a few that exempt all munis by statute).
QSBS (§1202)
decoupledDecoupled from IRC §1202 — the state does not follow the federal QSBS exclusion, so gain excluded on the federal return can still be taxed by the state.
no §1202No distinct state QSBS position applies here — either the jurisdiction levies no tax on the gain, or it does not separately recognize the §1202 exclusion. Confirm with a tax advisor.
Illustrative coordination gap
Because the rules differ, so does what coordination is worth. On an illustrative 30-year path, running a portfolio against each state's rules is worth an estimated ~$47,000/yr per $1M taxable in California versus ~$37,000/yr in Nevada — the coordination gap between the two (about +4.7%/yr vs +3.7%/yr modeled). A hypothetical, illustrative figure; the household's own depends on bracket, holdings, and residency (see the full basis of the estimate below).
A difference between two states is a decision waiting to be coordinated.
Turn it into a sequenced operating plan for a move, or fold it into a household's standing coordination record.
State law reflects 2025 tax-year law; last reviewed 2026-07-07. Every classification is a summary of state law; where a primary-source citation has been verified, it is linked on the card.
What changed
2026-07-07 — First law-review date and honest per-cell source labeling; primary-source citations verified for Illinois, California, New York, Texas, and Florida (more in progress).
2025 — Washington's 7% (+2.9%) excise on long-term capital gains reflected (enacted 2022).
2025 — New Hampshire's Interest & Dividends tax reflected as fully repealed, effective 2025.
2025 — Illinois estate-tax detail tracks the pending SB 2970 as of the review date.
Illustrative / hypothetical — not a real track record and not advice. The tax-management impact figure is a hypothetical, after-tax result from the retroactive application of a tax-management model to ~30 years of proxy-spliced market data on a single illustrative path; no client capital was invested, and hypothetical performance does not guarantee future results. Intended for sophisticated investors; it may not be relevant to your situation, and your actual figure depends on your own holdings, basis, and bracket. State tax facts reflect tax year 2025 and can change — confirm with a tax advisor. Driftwood Wealth is a registered investment adviser; Form ADV and Form CRS are available at adviserinfo.sec.gov.
DRIFTWOOD WEALTH · AUSTIN, TEXAS · FOUNDED 2024MODEL DATA AS OF JULY 2026 · FORM ADV & CRS AT ADVISERINFO.SEC.GOV
Driftwood. State tax law reflects 2025 tax-year law; last reviewed 2026-07-07. A comparison is a view of the reasoning graph — it authors no facts of its own.